![]() |
|
![]() |
Amazing Spider-Man Message Board >> View Post |
|
| ||||||
Subj: Re: Would resurrecting Harry Osborn be a good idea? Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 at 04:23:39 pm EDT | Reply Subj: Re: Would resurrecting Harry Osborn be a good idea? Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 at 09:30:34 am EDT | ||||||
> What 2 arcs ? He dropped it after the FIRST arc with Venom. > > The Queen arc is always the exemple given by Jenkins's fans but EVEN if you skip on it, (and he could have adressed the Flash sub-plot during it, even just in a "freakin" line here and there ...) Jenkins still had issues 7 to 14, 21 and 22, and 27 of Spectacular to adress and follow that. That makes 11 issues in which he CHOSE not to use or adress the Flash sub-plot. He can't well make the book about the Flash subplot. Writers need to move things at their own pace. Otherwise they're just hacking stuff out, and not writing the way they feel like they should write. In the Doc Ock arc, the story about Doc Ock and the ambassador took precedence over the Flash subplot. The fourteenth issue wasn't even about Spider-Man. It was about Joey. The final issue was about...his final issue. It was him putting a close on five years of working on the character. So that took precedence. When he wrote these issues, he believed he had the entire book all to himself to deal with the Flash subplot. So he could go at his own pace, and do it like he felt was right. Marvel had other plans, so he couldn't do what he wanted. | |||||||
Posted with Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.6 on Windows XP
| |||||||
|
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2021 Powermad Software |