Amazing Spider-Man Message Board >> View Post
·
Post By
Reverend Meteor

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 9,449
In Reply To
Unstable Molecule

Location: Calgary, AB Canada
Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 2,731
Subj: Re: Did Ned Leeds Make A Good Hobgoblin, Or Was Kingsley Better?
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 at 04:34:43 pm EST (Viewed 156 times)
Reply Subj: Re: Did Ned Leeds Make A Good Hobgoblin, Or Was Kingsley Better?
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 at 02:51:09 pm EST (Viewed 183 times)




    Quote:
    I love and I hate Hobgoblin Lives. I love it because I hated the reveal that Ned was the Hobgoblin, and Hobgoblin Lives finally fixed that.



    Quote:
    When I read ASM #289 it felt to me like the writers never had a clue who was behind the mask and didn't want to write about it anymore, so they revealed it was Ned and killed him just to make a problem go away. And many years later when PAD and DeFalco and Priest started blogging about it, my suspicions turned out to be right.



    Quote:
    And not for nothing, but any story that makes you think of the writers takes you right out of the story. Creator ego should never shine through in their work, and it's the reason I eventually turned against people like Priest, Byrne, and (of course) Joe Queseda.



    Quote:
    Why did I hate Hobgoblin Lives? Because Kingsley was such a disappointing choice. Almost any of the major suspects would have been better (except Flash). Donald Menken would have been a fun choice - a businessman with strong ties to the Osborn legacy. Roger Hochsburg had personal ties to Peter (although not very strong ones). The Foreigner would have been a great fit for most of the clues that we had prior to Leed's death. Even Lance Bannon would have been a fit.



    Quote:
    One thing that never made sense to me is why Georgie would have gone to Kingsley when he discovered the Goblin's Lair in the first place. "Hey Calvin Klein, look - I discovered a super-villain's lair!" It only made sense if Kingsley and Georgie were sleeping together or something - but they never really declared Kingsley as openly gay. Also, Kingsley would not have had the scientific knowledge (or access to scientific resources) to modify the Goblin formula. That alone should have ruled out Bannon, Leeds, Thompson and Kingsley.


Is Roderick gay? I just assumed because he was fictional he could somehow defy logic and somehow be a heterosexual fashion designer.


    Quote:
    Of course in a perfect world, Hobgoblin would have been Richard Fisk, Kingsley would have been the Rose, and Macendale would still be Jack-o-Lantern. But Fisk was dead by the time Hobgoblin Lives came out, and had already been revealed to be the Rose.


It may not have been a good reveal but I liked that Stern at least got a chance to show who he wanted Hobgoblin to be...and Ned got cleared.

I'm sure there are probably a few other comic mysteries that were totally changed during a writer change so it was nice to see who Stern had in mind. At the end of the day Roderick doesn't seem an illogical choice...an unethical business man with lots of cash, a flair for the dramatic, with a twin brother...I could see it.



Posted with Mozilla Firefox 57.0 on Windows 7
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2018 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2018 by Alvaro Ortiz and Dave Galanter. Software Copyright © 2003-2018 Powermad Software