The Superman Family Message Board >> View Post
·
Post By
Knight

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 9,224
In Reply To
liheibao

Member Since: Thu May 07, 2009
Posts: 2,967
Subj: Guys, guys, it's not that big of a deal. *Spoilers*
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 at 02:15:08 pm EST (Viewed 69 times)
Reply Subj: Re: ok issue
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 at 05:55:15 am EST (Viewed 77 times)

Previous Post


    Quote:
    3) not a fan of Selina knowing who Superman is because it's obvious. We're supposed to accept/believe-in the convention that glasses/changed mannerisms WORKS. This violates and denigrates that. Nor do I like Lois being so blase about people knowing who her husband is. Doesn't she realize the magnitude danger this risks?


Exactly, especially since Jon has practically the same disguise. The irony? The Clark Kent disguise fooled Lois Lane. For years!


I thought it was a nice touch that Selina knows. If she really is going to marry Bruce Wayne, she should know Clark's secret. Lois even gives Clark some advice that I think is food for thought for the rest of us, "But you don't trust him to love someone we can trust."

If Selina really was a questionable person to know Clark's secret, she would have proven it by now. The fact that she knows, and has known for who knows how long, means she doesn't care if Clark is Superman and that she can be trusted with that kind of secret. I really don't know what the big deal is with Selina knowing.





It's interesting that a hero/villain performs one amazing feat, or use a power they haven't used for 20+ years, and that automatically propels them to a high status despite scans and evidence to the contrary. I don't know what is worse, selective feat picking that has only been done once or twice 20, or more, years ago or ignoring evidence from scans or the lack thereof. We need to stop putting our favorite heroes/villains on pedestals and start putting them where they really belong. But it's evident that people never will because they would rather accuse others of cherry picking feats, when they don't, and being 'morally superior' when they aren't. I guess being honest and as fair as possible only opens one up to being the target of childish accusations and fault finding by those who insist on acting petty and childish. What happened to a good debate between two civil, mature, adults?
Posted with Mozilla 11.0 on Windows 7
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2018 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2018 by Alvaro Ortiz and Dave Galanter. Software Copyright © 2003-2018 Powermad Software