The Superman Family Message Board >> View Post
Post By

Location: Lancashire
Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 38,619
In Reply To

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 60,853
Subj: Re: Superman #37: Or is it Supertim #37? *koff*
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2017 at 06:56:28 pm EST (Viewed 127 times)
Reply Subj: Superman #37: Or is it Supertim #37? *koff*
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2017 at 04:12:20 pm EST (Viewed 167 times)

Previous Post

Superman 037

The cover is a LIE.
Bat-tim pawns Bruce for HALF of Supes book.
Bat-tim then SUPERPAWNS Kal.
That's IT.

There is WANTING followup from last arc - Supes only brooding over a broken Fortress statue (that he can easily fix).
There was NOTHING pleasing about this ish.
Well, except for the art; the ART was very good.
Or you'd like it if you're a HUGE fan of alternate-future Tim Drake (spotlighted in an Supes book to boot *koff*).

Support Cancer Research and Alzheimer Research.

I've been reluctant to say anything more about the Superman books as I am aware that I started to sound like a broken record and, arguably, unduly negative about the substance. But here again lies the evidence to support my growing criticisms of Superman, and certain other DC comics, in that there is little or nothing fresh happening anymore. Nothing new being devised. No mandate being enforced by editors to make their writers aim for new ideas, new situations.

So, The Titans of Tomorrow. Geoff Johns' contribution to the Teen Titans mythos and a future reality heavily based on the life, future, and roles of best friends Kon-el and Time Drake. The entire premise was tied into those two popular characters and a particular period of Teen Titans history. And back then it worked. Right now though, here in 2017, none of those characters are remotely relevant, they are barely even fading echoes, indeed with 2011 all of their history was erased and none of this matters a bit anymore.

So what the hell is this?!

Darwyn Cookes New Frontier. Geoff Johns parallax/Green Lantern mythos. Geoff Johns' Justice League storylines. Grant Morrison's Multiversity. Joe Kelly's Manchester Black storylines.A Return to Krypton. Doomsday/The Death of Superman.... Where is the ambition? It seems certain that the trend for looking backwards for story potential is a deliberate policy, that the complete lack of anything new or daring for 'Superman' and his readers is entirely accepted and supported by the editorial regime. My question is - why? Surely the likes of Peter Thomasi, patrick Gleason, and Dan Jurgens, have more appetite, ambition, and fine story ideas than this now ceaseless monthly recycling of old existing stock characters and storylines we are experiencing here in their output. That someone thought that The Titans of Tomorrow would be a suitable and at concept to return to,
literally return to, despite it not even being compatible with the modern landscape of the DC Universe, shows off a whole new level of unambition that does no one involved with it any favours.

The Titans of Tommorrow... One may as well be speaking of Matrix-Supergirl or the Team Titans for all the interest and relevance these characters have today.

Posted with Google Chrome 63.0.3239.84 on Windows 7
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2018 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2018 by Alvaro Ortiz and Dave Galanter. Software Copyright © 2003-2018 Powermad Software