The Thor Message Board - Re: He was the director of SHIELD at the time so he may have

Post By

Thor64

Member Since: Sun Nov 05, 2017
Posts: 217

In Reply To

ThorTheMightiestAvenger

Member Since: Wed Mar 30, 2016
Posts: 685

Subj: Re: He was the director of SHIELD at the time so he may have been able to grant diplomatic immunity
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2017 at 10:52:06 am EST (Viewed 219 times)

Reply Subj: He was the director of SHIELD at the time so he may have been able to grant diplomatic immunity
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2017 at 07:57:51 am EST (Viewed 196 times)

<< Prev

NewEmailPrintRSSIndex

Quote:

Or he was able to get someone else in power to do it. Either way, I’m not thinking he wants to lie to Thor after the whooping Thor just gave him. Stark explicitly promises diplomatic immunity AND Asgard becoming an embassy

Yup.

It was either this, or making an enemy of the most powerful mythological god of all time.

It would not be smart at all to take option 2.

Posted with Mozilla Firefox 57.0 on MacOS X

NewEmailPrintRSSIndex

How much is Thor bound by mortal law? · seeker · Fri Dec 08, 2017 at 09:59:10 pm EST
- Re: How much is Thor bound by mortal law? · bd2999 · Tue Dec 12, 2017 at 10:16:38 am EST
- Not really, he has diplomatic immunity · ThorTheMightiestAvenger · Sat Dec 09, 2017 at 04:09:48 pm EST
  - The so-called "diplomatic immunity" applies only if two sovereign states have diplomatic relations with each other. · bouken red · Sat Dec 09, 2017 at 08:11:23 pm EST
    - That’s all true, but Thor’s situation was a bit different · ThorTheMightiestAvenger · Sat Dec 09, 2017 at 10:56:38 pm EST
      - Actually, diplomatic immunity and embassy are two different things. · bouken red · Sun Dec 10, 2017 at 02:45:08 am EST
        
        He was the director of SHIELD at the time so he may have been able to grant diplomatic immunity · ThorTheMightiestAvenger · Sun Dec 10, 2017 at 07:57:51 am EST
        
        I re-read Thor #3...it's not what you think. · bouken red · Sun Dec 10, 2017 at 11:40:54 pm EST
        
        Re: I re-read Thor #3...it's not what you think. · jazzbass6 · Mon Dec 11, 2017 at 03:35:15 pm EST
        
        Even if you own your house and land, it does not excuse you from obeying the law. (no text) · bouken red · Thu Dec 14, 2017 at 06:07:19 am EST
        Re: I re-read Thor #3...it's not what you think. · skrayper · Tue Dec 12, 2017 at 10:55:51 am EST
        
        Yup! Correct. (no text) · bouken red · Thu Dec 14, 2017 at 06:10:10 am EST
        Re: I re-read Thor #3...it's not what you think. · jazzbass6 · Tue Dec 12, 2017 at 03:48:18 pm EST
        
        Tony's offer was to grant Asgard embassy status...which he didn't have the power to do in the first place. (no text) · bouken red · Thu Dec 14, 2017 at 06:09:08 am EST
        
        Or, Stark was talking out of his ass because of the ass kicking he got from Thor. · bouken red · Sun Dec 10, 2017 at 11:06:22 pm EST
        Re: He was the director of SHIELD at the time so he may have been able to grant diplomatic immunity · Thor64 · Sun Dec 10, 2017 at 10:52:06 am EST
- Hmmmm...more legal questions in the Thor message board... · bouken red · Sat Dec 09, 2017 at 01:41:49 am EST
  - Re: Hmmmm...more legal questions in the Thor message board... · Thor64 · Sat Dec 09, 2017 at 09:09:03 pm EST
    - Even if Thor is a lowcase g "god", he has no dominion over Midgard. (no text) · bouken red · Sun Dec 10, 2017 at 02:30:28 am EST
      - Why? · seeker · Sun Dec 10, 2017 at 11:22:00 am EST
        
        Is it widely accepted in the Marvel Universe that Odin created Man? · bouken red · Sun Dec 10, 2017 at 11:01:28 pm EST
        
        And how does that matter to Thor, Odin or Gaea? · seeker · Mon Dec 11, 2017 at 12:10:20 am EST
        
        Re: And how does that matter to Thor, Odin or Gaea? · skrayper · Tue Dec 12, 2017 at 10:53:12 am EST
        Re: And how does that matter to Thor, Odin or Gaea? · skrayper · Tue Dec 12, 2017 at 10:53:11 am EST