X-Universe >> View Post
·
Post By
Grey Gargoyle

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 7,422
In Reply To
Menshevik

Member Since: Sat May 17, 2008
Posts: 3,413
Subj: Please
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2017 at 11:45:13 am EDT (Viewed 58 times)
Reply Subj: Of course...
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2017 at 06:18:13 am EDT (Viewed 67 times)



    Quote:
    Quote

    ...the fact that their best works (in your opinion) were on other titles does not necessarily mean that their Wolverine work (like e.g. John Byrne's work on the FF, Alpha Flight, Superman etc., or PAD's work on Spider-Man, Supergirl, Young Justice etc.) was to sneeze at or that they couldn't write a good Wolverine.

    Also, wouldn't writing a good "old school" Wolverine be the opposite of "jumping the shark", so why should adding something new to Wolverine even be a necessary criterion? Finally, the Claremontian Wolverine is to a large extent John Byrne's baby due to his co-plotting during the CC/JB run. It was due to Byrne's influence that his fellow Canadian Logan gradually took centre stage and developed his familiar personality (Len Wein wanted to make Colossus the star of the book and Dave Cockrum obviously favoured Nightcrawler).


Please, if you don't mind, try to answer no more to any of my posts.

Many thanks in advance.

I promise that I won't bother you and I won't make any harsh comment about one of your messages.

I have absolutely no hard feeling against you but it is better that way. I might lose my temper and you are not responsible of my bad temper & susceptibility, of course.

Best Regards


Posted with Google Chrome 61.0.3163.100 on Windows 7
Alvaro's Comicboards powered by On Topic™ © 2003-2017 Powermad Software
All the content of these boards Copyright © 1996-2017 by Alvaro Ortiz and Dave Galanter. Software Copyright © 2003-2017 Powermad Software